2003 State Qualifying
Dec 4, 2002
Per Ernie Lee (Gunn HS) and his calculations are NOT the final word, just for information only (since we know you all love this kind of stuff). CCS (baseline 2 entries) DI Boys: 2 DI Girls: 2 DII Boys: 2 DII Girls: 3 DIII Boys: 3 DIII Girls: 3 DIV Boys: 3 DIV Girls: 3 DV Boys: 3 DV Girls: 3 Notes: - the only change is that we lose one entry in DIII boys to the Sac-Joaquin section. - in my previous calculation, it appeared that we would lose one in DV boys as well, however, the Southern section is maxed out with 7 so we should get to keep it. By the way, very few changes elsewhere. Here's what I figure: DI Boys: no change DI Girls: Central and Sac-Joaquin are tied for the last entry, don't know how they break the tie (if Central gets it, then there's no change) DII Boys: Central section loses one, Sac Joaquin gains one DII Girls: no change from what it should have been, but Central loses it's third and we keep our third DIII Boys: Sac-Joaquin gains one, we lose one DIII Girls: no change DIV Boys: Southern gains one, San Diego loses one DIV Girls: no change DV Boys: no change DV Girls: no change Again, this are just my quick calculations, they obviously need to be checked. Also, if they increase the maximum to 8 per section, then the numbers change (on first glance, the only affect on us would be the possibility of us losing our third qualifier in DII girls).2002 State Qualifying
July 31, 2002
| 2002 Cross Country Automatic Entries State championships | ||||||||||||
| From: Peter Brewer, Castro Valley HS-NCS | ||||||||||||
| Article 1701 (proposed modification) | ||||||||||||
| Team entries into the state championship cross country meet shall be based on a formula that is comprised of two factors: | ||||||||||||
| 1) An established baseline providing a minimum number of entries for each section; | ||||||||||||
| 2) Additional entries based upon the most recent four (4) year history of the section team performance in each divisional race. | ||||||||||||
| No section shall have more than seven (7) team entries in any division race | ||||||||||||
| 2002 Cross country Automatic Entries State championships | ||||||||||||
| Division I | Division II | Division III | Division IV | Division V | ||||||||
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | |||
| Central Coast | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Central | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Los Angeles | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| North Coast | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Northern | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Oakland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| San Diego | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| San Francisco | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Sac-Joaquin | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Southern | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
| 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | |||
| Notes: | ||||||||||||
| 1) The total number of 23 in each race was arrived at in discussion with state meet management, | ||||||||||||
| who had felt for the last few years that 24 or 25 teams on the line was too much for efficient race management. | ||||||||||||
| 2) The only exception to this is the San Francisco section. In the event that a non-Division I | ||||||||||||
| team wins the Section title, that team would advance to the state meet in its respective division. | ||||||||||||
| Girls' Division I | ||||||||||||
| CC | CS | LA | NC | NS | OAK | SJ | SF | SD | SS | |||
| Baseline | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 18 | |
| Total top 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 24 | ||
| Potential 4 yr total | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | ||
| % of total | 2.5 | 10 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | 7.5 | 2.5 | 12.5 | 60 | ||
| Openings 5 x % | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 | 0.375 | 0.125 | 0.625 | 3 | ||
| Baseline + adjustment | 2.125 | 2.55 | 2.125 | 2.125 | 0 | 1 | 2.375 | 1.125 | 2.625 | 7 | ||
| 2002 entries | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 23 | |
| GIRLS' DIVISION I HISTORY | 4 YEAR TOP 10 TEAMS | |||||||||||
| 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | CC | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | SS | SS | SS | SS | CS | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | SS | SD | CS | SS | LA | 1 | ||||||
| 3 | SD | SS | SS | SS | NC | 1 | ||||||
| 4 | CS | SS | SD | SS | NS | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | SD | SF | SS | SS | OAK | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | SS | SS | SS | SS | SD | 3 | ||||||
| 7 | SJ | SJ | SS | SS | SF | 1 | ||||||
| 8 | SS | CS | CC | SD | SJ | 5 | ||||||
| 9 | NC | SS | SS | CS | SS | 24 | ||||||
| 10 | CS | LA | SS | SJ | 40 | |||||||
| Boys' Division I | ||||||||||||
| CC | CS | LA | NC | NS | OAK | SJ | SF | SD | SS | |||
| Baseline | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 18 | |
| Total top 10 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 16 | ||
| Potential 4 yr total | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | ||
| % of total | 5 | 12.5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12.5 | 0 | 15 | 40 | ||
| Openings 5 x % | 0.25 | 0.625 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0 | 0 | 0.625 | 0 | 0.75 | 2 | ||
| Baseline + adjustment | 2.25 | 2.65 | 2.5 | 2.25 | 0 | 1 | 2.65 | 1 | 2.75 | 6 | ||
| 2002 entries | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 23 | |
| BOYS' DIVISION I HISTORY | 4 YEAR TOP 10 TEAMS | |||||||||||
| 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | CC | 2 | |||||||
| 1 | SS | SS | SS | SS | CS | 5 | ||||||
| 2 | SS | CS | CS | SS | LA | 4 | ||||||
| 3 | SS | SD | SD | SS | NC | 2 | ||||||
| 4 | LA | SS | SS | SS | NS | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | SS | SD | SJ | CS | OAK | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | SS | SS | CC | SJ | SD | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | SJ | SS | LA | LA | SF | 0 | ||||||
| 8 | SD | SJ | SD | NC | SJ | 6 | ||||||
| 9 | SD | LA | SS | SJ | SS | 16 | ||||||
| 10 | CC | CS | CS | NC | 40 | |||||||
| Girls' Division II | ||||||||||||
| CC | CS | LA | NC | NS | OAK | SJ | SF | SD | SS | |||
| Baseline | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 15 | |
| Total top 10 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 18 | ||
| Potential 4 yr total | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | ||
| % of total | 2.5 | 5 | 0 | 22.5 | 2.5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 12.5 | 45 | ||
| Openings 8 x % | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.8 | 0 | 1 | 3.6 | ||
| Baseline + adjustment | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0 | 2.8 | 0 | 3 | 7.6 | ||
| 2002 entries | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 23 | |
| GIRLS' DIVISION II HISTORY | 4 YEAR TOP 10 TEAMS | |||||||||||
| 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | CC | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | SS | SS | NC | SD | CS | 2 | ||||||
| 2 | SS | SS | SS | SS | LA | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | SS | NC | SS | NC | NC | 9 | ||||||
| 4 | SS | SD | SS | SS | NS | 1 | ||||||
| 5 | NC | SS | NC | NC | OAK | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | NS | SS | SS | SS | SD | 5 | ||||||
| 7 | SJ | NC | SS | SD | SF | 0 | ||||||
| 8 | SJ | CC | CS | NC | SJ | 4 | ||||||
| 9 | NC | SD | CS | SS | SS | 18 | ||||||
| 10 | SD | SJ | SJ | SS | 40 | |||||||
| Boys' Division II | ||||||||||||
| CC | CS | LA | NC | NS | OAK | SJ | SF | SD | SS | |||
| Baseline | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 15 | |
| Total top 10 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 15 | ||
| Potential 4 yr total | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | ||
| % of total | 2.5 | 7.5 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 17.5 | 0 | 15 | 37.5 | ||
| Openings 15 x % | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 | 0 | 1.2 | 3 | ||
| Baseline + adjustment | 2.2 | 2.6 | 0 | 3.6 | 0 | 0 | 3.4 | 0 | 3.2 | 7 | ||
| 2002 entries | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 23 | |
| BOYS' DIVISION II HISTORY | 4 YEAR TOP 10 TEAMS | |||||||||||
| 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | CC | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | SS | NC | SJ | SS | CS | 3 | ||||||
| 2 | SD | SS | SS | SS | LA | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | CC | SD | NC | SS | NC | 8 | ||||||
| 4 | SJ | SS | SS | NC | NS | 0 | ||||||
| 5 | SJ | SJ | NC | SJ | OAK | 0 | ||||||
| 6 | CS | SS | SS | SD | SD | 7 | ||||||
| 7 | CS | NC | SS | NC | SF | 0 | ||||||
| 8 | CS | SJ | SD | SS | SJ | 6 | ||||||
| 9 | NC | SS | SS | SD | SS | 15 | ||||||
| 10 | SD | CC | SJ | NC | 40 | |||||||
| Girls' Division III | ||||||||||||
| CC | CS | LA | NC | NS | OAK | SJ | SF | SD | SS | |||
| Baseline | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 15 | |